Comparative Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) With or Without Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) Pattern in Lumbosacral Dysfunction

Comparative Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique (MET)

Authors

  • Ramiza Khalid Faculty of Medical Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Sobia Hasan Department of Physical Therapy, Iqra University North Campus, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Tehreem Anis Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Dadabhoy Institute of Higher Education, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Syeda Waniya Riaz Department of Physical Therapy, Iqra University North Campus, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Ayesha Maroof The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Anees Arshad Margalla Institute of Health and Sciences, Islamabad College of Physiotherapy, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Tuba Umar Movenow Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Center, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Ali Husnain Faculty of Medical Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Amna Khalid Faculty of Medical Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/tt.v5i01.198

Keywords:

Muscle Energy Technique, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation, Lumbosacral Dysfunction, Motor Impairments

Abstract

Lumbosacral dysfunction is a condition affecting the lumbar and sacral regions of the spine, causing back pain, limited range of motion, sensory deficits, and motor impairments. It can be caused by degenerative changes, traumatic injuries, congenital anomalies, or abnormal biomechanics. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the effects Muscle Energy Technique (MET) alone and with combination of PNF in treating lumbosacral syndrome. Methods: The study was a quasi-experimental design over the duration of 8 weeks. Purposive sampling was employed with a sample size of 40 patients, divided equally into Group A (N= 20) who received MET combined with PNF and Group B (N= 20) that only received MET. We used Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Pain Rate Scale (NPRS) and goniometer to assess disability, pain, and range of motion (ROM). We analyzed the data using IBM SPSS version 23.0. Results: Outcome measures including pain intensity, functional disability, and range of motion, were assessed at baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks).  The group A showed significant improvements in all outcome measures compared to the group B at post-intervention assessments (p < 0.05), pain intensity decreased by 60-80%. Functional disability scores were reduced by 60-75% in the group A, while the group B showed only 40% significant change. Moreover, the group A exhibited a substantial increase in lumbosacral range of motion compared to the group B. Conclusions: The study reveals that both MET alone and MET combined with PNF effectively improve pain, functional disability, and lumbar range of motion in lumbosacral dysfunction patients. 

References

Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Practice and Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2010 Dec ;24(6): 769-81. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.002.

Verbunt JA, Westerterp KR, van der Heijden GJ, Seelen HA, Vlaeyen JW, Knottnerus JA. Physical activity in daily life in patients with chronic low back pain. Archives of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation. 2001 Jun; 82(6): 726-30. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.23182.

Huijnen IP, Verbunt JA, Peters ML, Delespaul P, Kindermans HP, Roelofs J, et al. Do depression and pain intensity interfere with physical activity in daily life in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain?. Pain. 2010 Jul; 150(1): 161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.021.

Helbig TH, Lee CK. The lumbar facet syndrome. Spine. 1988 Jan; 13(1): 61-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198801000-00015.

Varlotta GP, Lefkowitz TR, Schweitzer M, Errico TJ, Spivak J, Bendo JA, et al. The lumbar facet joint: a review of current knowledge: part 1: anatomy, biomechanics, and grading. Skeletal Radiology. 2011 Jan; 40: 13-23. doi: 10.1007/s00256-010-0983-4.

Alexander CE, Cascio MA, Varacallo M. Lumbosacral Facet Syndrome. PMID: 28722935.

Grant RA and Abbed KM. Diagnostic Testing for Lumbosacral and Pelvic Pathologies. In Lumbosacral and Pelvic Procedures.

Beresford ZM, Kendall RW, Willick SE. Lumbar facet syndromes. Current Sports Medicine Reports. 2010 Jan; 9(1): 50-6. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e3181caba05.

Kofotolis N and Kellis E. Effects of two 4-week proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation programs on muscle endurance, flexibility, and functional performance in women with chronic low back pain. Physical Therapy. 2006 Jul; 86(7): 1001-12. doi: 10.1093/ptj/86.7.1001.

Wilson E, Payton O, Donegan-Shoaf L, Dec K. Muscle energy technique in patients with acute low back pain: a pilot clinical trial. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical therapy. 2003 Sep; 33(9): 502-12. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.9.502.

Young KJ, Je CW, Hwa ST. Effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation integration pattern and swiss ball training on pain and balance in elderly patients with chronic back pain. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2015 Jun; 27(10): 3237-40. 10.1589/jpts.27.3237.

Franke H, Fryer G, Ostelo RW, Kamper SJ. Muscle energy technique for non‐specific low‐back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015; 2015(2): 1465-1858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009852.pub2.

Areeudomwong P and Buttagat V. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training improves pain-related and balance outcomes in working-age patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2019 Sep; 23(5): 428-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.10.005.

Kumar P and Moitra M. Efficacy of muscle energy technique and pnf stretching compared to conventional physiotherapy in program of hamstring flexibility in chronic nonspecific low back pain. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther Int J. 2015 Jul; 9(3): 103. doi: 10.5958/0973-5674.2015.00105.7.

Patel S, Khatri S, Patel P. Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique as Compared to Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Non-Specific Low Back Pain: RCT. International Journal of Research and Review. 2022 March; 9(3): 173-182. doi: 10.52403/ijrr.20220321.

Dhargalkar P, Kulkarni A, Ghodey S. Added effect of muscle energy technique for improving functional ability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Int J Physiother Res. 2017 Jun; 5(3): 2082-7. doi: 10.16965/ijpr.2017.144.

Gao P, Tang F, Liu W, Mo Y. The effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in treating chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2022 Jan ;35(1): 21-33. doi: 10.3233/BMR-200306.

Arazi H, Nia F, Hakimi M, Mohamadi M. The effect of PNF stretching combined with a resistance training on strength, muscle volume and flexibility in non-athlete male students. Sport Science. 2012 Jun; 5(1): 85-90.

Wahyuddin W, Vongsirinavarat M, Mekhora K, Bovonsunthonchai S, Adisaipoapun R. Immediate effects of muscle energy technique and stabilization exercise in patients with chronic low back pain with suspected facet joint origin: A pilot study. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal. 2020 Dec; 40(02): 109-19. doi: 10.1142/S1013702520500109.

Patel VD, Eapen C, Ceepee Z, Kamath R. Effect of muscle energy technique with and without strain–counterstrain technique in acute low back pain—A randomized clinical trial. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal. 2018 Jun; 38(01): 41-51. doi: 10.1142/S1013702518500051.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/tt.v5i01.198
Published: 2024-03-31

How to Cite

Khalid, R., Hasan, S., Anis, T., Riaz, S. W., Maroof, A., Arshad, A., Umar, T., Husnain, A., & Khalid, A. (2024). Comparative Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) With or Without Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) Pattern in Lumbosacral Dysfunction : Comparative Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) . THE THERAPIST (Journal of Therapies &Amp; Rehabilitation Sciences), 5(01), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.54393/tt.v5i01.198

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>